anti human e selectin ab (R&D Systems)
Structured Review

Anti Human E Selectin Ab, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 44 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti human e selectin ab/product/R&D Systems
Average 93 stars, based on 44 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "CA19-9 promotes liver metastasis of pancreatic cancer through E-selectin mediated extravasation"
Article Title: CA19-9 promotes liver metastasis of pancreatic cancer through E-selectin mediated extravasation
Journal: bioRxiv
doi: 10.64898/2026.04.08.717301
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Representative images of adhesion assay using Calcein-AM stained CA19-9 negative (top) and positive (bottom) cells adhered to HUVECs. Scale bars = 100 μm. (B) Quantification of adhered CA19-9 neg and CA19-9 pos FC1199 (left), KPCY (middle) and FC1245 (right) cells per field. (C, D) Quantification of adhered CA19-9 pos FC1199 cells treated with anti-CA19-9 antibody (5B1; αCA19-9) (C) and anti-human E-selectin antibody (BBA16; αSELE) (D) compared with isotype control (ISO). (E, F) Quantification of adhered hM19a 2D cells treated with anti-CA19-9 antibody (5B1; αCA19-9) (E) and anti-human E-selectin antibody (BBA16; αSELE) (F) compared with isotype control (ISO). (G) Quantification of adhered Capan-2 cells after FUT3 knockout (sgFUT3) compared with a negative control (sgCtrl). *Data are presented as mean ± SD. Data are representative of at least two independent experiments. Statistical significance was determined by unpaired two-tailed t-test with Welch’s correction. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Techniques Used: Cell Adhesion Assay, Staining, Control, Knock-Out, Negative Control, Two Tailed Test
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Schema of study design for metastatic seeding analysis in (B, C). (B) Representative YFP IHC of liver sections one day after splenic injection of CA19-9 neg or CA19-9 pos KPCY cells. Scale bar = 200 μm. (C) Quantification of YFP+ tumor cells in liver sections of WT mice injected with CA19-9 neg or CA19-9 pos KPCY cells, normalized by tissue area (mm²). (D) Schema of study design in (E-H). (E) Representative macroscopic images of livers isolated from WT (left) and E-selectin KO (right) mice injected with CA19-9 pos cells. Scale bar = 1 cm. (F, G) Quantification of liver weight (F) and of liver weight normalized by body weight (G). (H) Quantification of CK19 positive area (%) across the whole liver sections. (I) Schema of study design in (J) (J) Quantification of YFP+ tumor cells in liver sections of WT and E-selectin KO mice injected with CA19-9 pos KPCY cells, normalized by tissue area (mm²). (K) Schema of study design in (L, M) (L, M) Quantification of CA19-9 pos KPCY cells in liver sections of WT mice injected with CA19-9 pos KPCY cells and treated with isotype control or anti-CA19-9 antibody (5B1; αCA19-9) (L), or isotype control or anti-mouse E-selectin antibody (9A9; αSele) (M), normalized by tissue area (mm²). *Data are presented as mean ± SD. Each dot represents an individual mouse. For A-H, mice were injected with 1 × 10 5 tumor cells per mouse. For I-M, mice were injected with 3 × 10 5 tumor cells per mouse. Statistical significance was calculated using unpaired two-tailed t-test with Welch’s correction. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Techniques Used: Injection, Isolation, Control, Two Tailed Test

